Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 20:46:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A6A1F3EB65E0D63C6E4FBF9959082F1DDFF32776493D19FA5A4666328EDC90B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. If this was an obviously falsified story, as claimed by noter, surely evidence - such as proof from the area - could be provided. Instead, the proposed note claims this breaking story is "not widely reported enough" - which is merely conjecture.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849124071784538170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A6A1F3EB65E0D63C6E4FBF9959082F1DDFF32776493D19FA5A4666328EDC90B
  • createdAtMillis - 1729716395862
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18491240717845381704A6A1F3EB65E0D63C6E4FBF9959082F1DDFF32776493D19FA5A4666328EDC90B