Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 22:53:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77B2BF7A119C9D2697257758F2A2E0A412FC946032CD750A9FA34966D2AC2C99
Participant Details

Original Note:

La cour a également déclaré dans le même jugement: "ce n'est pas un commentaire sur l'efficacité de la vaccination" https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=lSCD/VVp5ButOxtfdQ4Adw==

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849039752021914014
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 77B2BF7A119C9D2697257758F2A2E0A412FC946032CD750A9FA34966D2AC2C99
  • createdAtMillis - 1729724019945
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 184903975202191401477B2BF7A119C9D2697257758F2A2E0A412FC946032CD750A9FA34966D2AC2C99