Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-27 23:02:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE7F3C17CA86390840158918EE10DB87C7CA3903034B5AE8A6DF39BA13A8A88A
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'utente, noto per le sue posizioni anti-juventine, giudica erroneamente un'azione in cui รจ evidente il fallo (ginocchiata). Da qui l'accusa a Conceicao di essere un simulatore, con contestazione (senza fondamento) del giudizio del responsabile arbitrale, il designatore Rocchi: https://x.com/DiMarzio/status/1847335872452067370

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848986700434817413
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE7F3C17CA86390840158918EE10DB87C7CA3903034B5AE8A6DF39BA13A8A88A
  • createdAtMillis - 1730070161999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848986700434817413FE7F3C17CA86390840158918EE10DB87C7CA3903034B5AE8A6DF39BA13A8A88A