Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 05:56:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AD302D8E35E17AAF1A3EE8124FE61DD9C3FC093265D0CEC2781D8C212EBACB09
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- The rejection from someone who stands to gain by misrepresenting the claim, along with the denial from an individual who wasn’t involved in the discussion, doesn’t negate the fact that the event took place. The reporter referred to a source that remained unnamed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848901286550262235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AD302D8E35E17AAF1A3EE8124FE61DD9C3FC093265D0CEC2781D8C212EBACB09
  • createdAtMillis - 1729662967551
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848901286550262235AD302D8E35E17AAF1A3EE8124FE61DD9C3FC093265D0CEC2781D8C212EBACB09