Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 02:46:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6B9A44CE8E5C940FFB1454055E344D4293D7B325207F8C6681C3198D95EABB2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- The rejection from someone who stands to gain by misrepresenting the claim, along with the denial from an individual who wasn’t involved in the discussion, doesn’t negate the fact that the event took place. The reporter referred to a source that remained unnamed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848901286550262235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6B9A44CE8E5C940FFB1454055E344D4293D7B325207F8C6681C3198D95EABB2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1729651606679
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18489012865502622356B9A44CE8E5C940FFB1454055E344D4293D7B325207F8C6681C3198D95EABB2A