Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 08:52:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7770CFC377A95469ED3F8D82340A528775D7815B7F9E3D50A1AA90D5FC6BED1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The defamatory statement indicated in the above note was made in the film which if he showed he would be in contempt of court. The OP is therefore correct in that they are being charged for showing a film. Therefore note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848891532826325301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7770CFC377A95469ED3F8D82340A528775D7815B7F9E3D50A1AA90D5FC6BED1
  • createdAtMillis - 1729673526905
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848891532826325301F7770CFC377A95469ED3F8D82340A528775D7815B7F9E3D50A1AA90D5FC6BED1