Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 16:10:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7F268FC98FA690FF9A2C8B1E35694D4175E7E8EFEF0A60FA0C54E1206AC29F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The defamatory statement indicated in the above note was made in the film which if he showed he would be in contempt of court. The OP is therefore correct in that they are being charged for showing a film. Therefore note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848891532826325301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7F268FC98FA690FF9A2C8B1E35694D4175E7E8EFEF0A60FA0C54E1206AC29F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1729872608288
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848891532826325301D7F268FC98FA690FF9A2C8B1E35694D4175E7E8EFEF0A60FA0C54E1206AC29F3