Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 12:57:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C42C7D4AF5899DBC008F7B84368E839E8FD97E346C429C90455636DF33DE60FF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The defamatory statement indicated in the above note was made in the film which if he showed he would be in contempt of court. The OP is therefore correct in that they are being charged for showing a film. Therefore note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848891532826325301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C42C7D4AF5899DBC008F7B84368E839E8FD97E346C429C90455636DF33DE60FF
  • createdAtMillis - 1729688262397
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848891532826325301C42C7D4AF5899DBC008F7B84368E839E8FD97E346C429C90455636DF33DE60FF