Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-24 07:43:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7B9EFFDCF4034CFE15F2869E5689B480CEEC5B7197404D1D5A556865B87DDB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The defamatory statement indicated in the above note was made in the film which if he showed he would be in contempt of court. The OP is therefore correct in that they are being charged for showing a film. Therefore note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848891532826325301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7B9EFFDCF4034CFE15F2869E5689B480CEEC5B7197404D1D5A556865B87DDB3
  • createdAtMillis - 1729755785817
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848891532826325301B7B9EFFDCF4034CFE15F2869E5689B480CEEC5B7197404D1D5A556865B87DDB3