Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 06:07:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 584115FACCE313F7C736B4C5F4261923D2F61191277D163B49FB9A5AAE1B90C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The defamatory statement indicated in the above note was made in the film which if he showed he would be in contempt of court. The OP is therefore correct in that they are being charged for showing a film. Therefore note not needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848891532826325301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 584115FACCE313F7C736B4C5F4261923D2F61191277D163B49FB9A5AAE1B90C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1729663670753
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848891532826325301584115FACCE313F7C736B4C5F4261923D2F61191277D163B49FB9A5AAE1B90C9