Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 14:39:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1DC75E695F3B8B5EA0FD3E8D6739B02D1EF9A2B5F13C9DF1BC78BBE1B1B955E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The denial from Mark Meadows is already included in the article. Readers can weigh his claim against the other evidence presented in the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848842658153959590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1DC75E695F3B8B5EA0FD3E8D6739B02D1EF9A2B5F13C9DF1BC78BBE1B1B955E
  • createdAtMillis - 1729694383698
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848842658153959590F1DC75E695F3B8B5EA0FD3E8D6739B02D1EF9A2B5F13C9DF1BC78BBE1B1B955E