Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 22:18:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D7A50A6314B2C43F85D6D2E3123B9D6D24A8B30786532196EDFD1D0AD4A21E2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The denial from Mark Meadows is already included in the article. Readers can weigh his claim against the other evidence presented in the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848842658153959590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D7A50A6314B2C43F85D6D2E3123B9D6D24A8B30786532196EDFD1D0AD4A21E2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1729635485665
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848842658153959590D7A50A6314B2C43F85D6D2E3123B9D6D24A8B30786532196EDFD1D0AD4A21E2D