Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 03:43:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43089659F19F24A3CFED3E9E27E746B091DF97FA4F09C0AD0B935393C27F8DFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The denial from Mark Meadows is already included in the article. Readers can weigh his claim against the other evidence presented in the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848842658153959590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43089659F19F24A3CFED3E9E27E746B091DF97FA4F09C0AD0B935393C27F8DFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1729654988212
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184884265815395959043089659F19F24A3CFED3E9E27E746B091DF97FA4F09C0AD0B935393C27F8DFC