Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 22:14:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The denial from Mark Meadows is already included in the article. Readers can weigh his claim against the other evidence presented in the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848842658153959590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945
  • createdAtMillis - 1729635265190
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184884265815395959004E658F327477F298500303FD85F3678B4103AB9199117C4DE8636A178EC3945