Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-23 00:50:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0222D54409FF6C72A4A0A7411A21AC67D848598044F9954E5F13402B97855505
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The denial from Mark Meadows is already included in the article. Readers can weigh his claim against the other evidence presented in the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848842658153959590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0222D54409FF6C72A4A0A7411A21AC67D848598044F9954E5F13402B97855505
  • createdAtMillis - 1729644628091
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18488426581539595900222D54409FF6C72A4A0A7411A21AC67D848598044F9954E5F13402B97855505