Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 18:14:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BDEB4545E95BD7B496FAE86B762663F1AAD8BDA2D386C2AE8E03AEE19503ACFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The originally credited author says it’s not plagiarism—they both used similar staffing pools to prepare the statements. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/10/22/kamala-harris-embroiled-in-second-plagiarism-row/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848787144023937055
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BDEB4545E95BD7B496FAE86B762663F1AAD8BDA2D386C2AE8E03AEE19503ACFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1729620856519
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848787144023937055BDEB4545E95BD7B496FAE86B762663F1AAD8BDA2D386C2AE8E03AEE19503ACFB