Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 20:42:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8F0D1B187F624680AA9D46A2AB5E5DACD67F8D387A4FB7BD0D8CCA07996C11B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

La première note ne prend pas en considération le terme: «ancien patient» pour induire les lecteurs en erreur et en affirmant que ce serait fictif!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848751375481749852
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8F0D1B187F624680AA9D46A2AB5E5DACD67F8D387A4FB7BD0D8CCA07996C11B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1729629772047
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18487513754817498528F0D1B187F624680AA9D46A2AB5E5DACD67F8D387A4FB7BD0D8CCA07996C11B4