Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 22:00:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44ADC8726B33C8072958A5AE969EF4C75DA68953CD6B0F641ADBEB4CAD06C214
Participant Details

Original Note:

La première note ne prend pas en considération le terme: «ancien patient» pour induire les lecteurs en erreur et en affirmant que ce serait fictif!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848751375481749852
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44ADC8726B33C8072958A5AE969EF4C75DA68953CD6B0F641ADBEB4CAD06C214
  • createdAtMillis - 1729634416341
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184875137548174985244ADC8726B33C8072958A5AE969EF4C75DA68953CD6B0F641ADBEB4CAD06C214