Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 23:04:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 31277C855F0602323CB14DD333CA0F96E4B142CDB99B3034AE84FCBBDEC2A7AF
Participant Details

Original Note:

La première note ne prend pas en considération le terme: «ancien patient» pour induire les lecteurs en erreur et en affirmant que ce serait fictif!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848751375481749852
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 31277C855F0602323CB14DD333CA0F96E4B142CDB99B3034AE84FCBBDEC2A7AF
  • createdAtMillis - 1729638249167
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184875137548174985231277C855F0602323CB14DD333CA0F96E4B142CDB99B3034AE84FCBBDEC2A7AF