Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 17:07:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E86CC39337900C07D2E4FE6649C3853E32013F6E4BB9375E4984829F7B254A5C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN source in proposed note in no way suggests that it is fake

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848607246009135288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E86CC39337900C07D2E4FE6649C3853E32013F6E4BB9375E4984829F7B254A5C
  • createdAtMillis - 1729616874492
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848607246009135288E86CC39337900C07D2E4FE6649C3853E32013F6E4BB9375E4984829F7B254A5C