Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 15:15:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF1F52DF666FF19ED6D4E911AFE1D90CBC53CE7BFF110CD4BD88E106C7F090E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN source in proposed note in no way suggests that it is fake

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848607246009135288
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF1F52DF666FF19ED6D4E911AFE1D90CBC53CE7BFF110CD4BD88E106C7F090E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1729610139318
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848607246009135288AF1F52DF666FF19ED6D4E911AFE1D90CBC53CE7BFF110CD4BD88E106C7F090E1