Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 04:14:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98B7956177B6054A5C8F0E0DA8856AFA0F0E453624542DB208913B2F0900591D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ultimately, they did reject the interview. The fact they rejected because they wanted a private interview can be clarified in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848518700456153480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98B7956177B6054A5C8F0E0DA8856AFA0F0E453624542DB208913B2F0900591D
  • createdAtMillis - 1729570452240
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184851870045615348098B7956177B6054A5C8F0E0DA8856AFA0F0E453624542DB208913B2F0900591D