Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 14:50:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5C9C8EB5005873DA1EA65F8422E966A66543E3FFF33E107E336F6D127B9831FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ultimately, they did reject the interview. The fact they rejected because they wanted a private interview can be clarified in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848518700456153480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5C9C8EB5005873DA1EA65F8422E966A66543E3FFF33E107E336F6D127B9831FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1729608640512
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18485187004561534805C9C8EB5005873DA1EA65F8422E966A66543E3FFF33E107E336F6D127B9831FE