Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 10:56:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E7E052B2DFEF99E76B1F91E1E4D64E4E5676EA1B42A70DF350F04384CCA7DFC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ultimately, they did reject the interview. The fact they rejected because they wanted a private interview can be clarified in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848518700456153480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E7E052B2DFEF99E76B1F91E1E4D64E4E5676EA1B42A70DF350F04384CCA7DFC
  • createdAtMillis - 1729594608090
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18485187004561534801E7E052B2DFEF99E76B1F91E1E4D64E4E5676EA1B42A70DF350F04384CCA7DFC