Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 04:45:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 024C4291AA8466A27CDA52797F8797D644D18705DB4537C693C4A0173B86C351
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ultimately, they did reject the interview. The fact they rejected because they wanted a private interview can be clarified in comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848518700456153480
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 024C4291AA8466A27CDA52797F8797D644D18705DB4537C693C4A0173B86C351
  • createdAtMillis - 1729572309183
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848518700456153480024C4291AA8466A27CDA52797F8797D644D18705DB4537C693C4A0173B86C351