Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 02:20:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3BD05BF2E5C7CEFDA29272C5BEDB68CC475E339A1EC28F4B64042553C491DB49
Participant Details

Original Note:

Writing "High Quality Source" doesn't make them high-quality. The number of views doesn't say anything about its success because people joking about it will also count towards that number. The comments give an indication and in the end, it's an opinion. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848504015459365170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3BD05BF2E5C7CEFDA29272C5BEDB68CC475E339A1EC28F4B64042553C491DB49
  • createdAtMillis - 1729563604173
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18485040154593651703BD05BF2E5C7CEFDA29272C5BEDB68CC475E339A1EC28F4B64042553C491DB49