Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 11:51:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D8DD6D6D565D871EA88C54E98DB227B140C76AA868CCC53B5F4FD8C050765C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Trump would like to get rid of § 230, which, on its terms, does not address free speech. But most analysts agree that eliminating § 230 would likely result in very heavy moderation of the net, which can legitimately, if hyperbolically, be understood as ending free speech. E.g., https://freedomhouse.org/article/qa-section-230-supreme-court-heres-why-matters-free-expression

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848320287147725107
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D8DD6D6D565D871EA88C54E98DB227B140C76AA868CCC53B5F4FD8C050765C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1729511499564
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18483202871477251070D8DD6D6D565D871EA88C54E98DB227B140C76AA868CCC53B5F4FD8C050765C2