Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 19:53:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9A164ADDB8FFC937919C6755D2BED66224576EC2FB5A0E63F5CC1317C0D90C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

nnn aside from the obvious bias in the proposed cn, the numbers cited are from a literal year ago it is a well known that, due to the continued destruction of medical facilities, it has become near impossible to accurately count the deceased https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02508-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848070359725277627
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9A164ADDB8FFC937919C6755D2BED66224576EC2FB5A0E63F5CC1317C0D90C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1729540388808
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848070359725277627B9A164ADDB8FFC937919C6755D2BED66224576EC2FB5A0E63F5CC1317C0D90C9