Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 23:55:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A2805547153A9F6D95A3AF293BA93EA94508D941CB76045036A322BE0B3E8094
Participant Details

Original Note:

nnn aside from the obvious bias in the proposed cn, the numbers cited are from a literal year ago it is a well known that, due to the continued destruction of medical facilities, it has become near impossible to accurately count the deceased https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02508-0

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848070359725277627
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A2805547153A9F6D95A3AF293BA93EA94508D941CB76045036A322BE0B3E8094
  • createdAtMillis - 1729468530587
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848070359725277627A2805547153A9F6D95A3AF293BA93EA94508D941CB76045036A322BE0B3E8094