Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 19:24:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FE4E53A342B7297800461ACD2EF9F2003DDEA52EB9C4C089792C1D0781ADFE43
Participant Details

Original Note:

PragerU being a known propaganda channel is useful context, as it brings into question their ability to produce "high-quality" content. As such, the community the note is justified. theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/06/prageru-climate-change-denier-republican-donors

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848068619152044239
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FE4E53A342B7297800461ACD2EF9F2003DDEA52EB9C4C089792C1D0781ADFE43
  • createdAtMillis - 1729538646952
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848068619152044239FE4E53A342B7297800461ACD2EF9F2003DDEA52EB9C4C089792C1D0781ADFE43