Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 19:39:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CF957A322ED931D22A6AFFC83DC92A22C30BB9820580CB8B7453CB4B4F45BF4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

PragerU being a known propaganda channel is useful context, as it brings into question their ability to produce "high-quality" content. As such, the community the note is justified. theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/06/prageru-climate-change-denier-republican-donors

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848068619152044239
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CF957A322ED931D22A6AFFC83DC92A22C30BB9820580CB8B7453CB4B4F45BF4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1729453142504
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1848068619152044239CF957A322ED931D22A6AFFC83DC92A22C30BB9820580CB8B7453CB4B4F45BF4D