Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 00:19:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C6E233C758EDB92B4A8627D373A64F113B8E33A98B7472145B8A5D3F3E4AF58
Participant Details

Original Note:

PragerU being a known propaganda channel is useful context, as it brings into question their ability to produce "high-quality" content. As such, the community the note is justified. theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/06/prageru-climate-change-denier-republican-donors

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848068619152044239
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C6E233C758EDB92B4A8627D373A64F113B8E33A98B7472145B8A5D3F3E4AF58
  • createdAtMillis - 1729469956164
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18480686191520442398C6E233C758EDB92B4A8627D373A64F113B8E33A98B7472145B8A5D3F3E4AF58