Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 05:53:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5BEC61FDC9F04497F4DCD0E8278EE6A8D9ED69D515A05099E4E4CC5CE59509C6
Participant Details

Original Note:

PragerU being a known propaganda channel is useful context, as it brings into question their ability to produce "high-quality" content. As such, the community the note is justified. theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/06/prageru-climate-change-denier-republican-donors

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1848068619152044239
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5BEC61FDC9F04497F4DCD0E8278EE6A8D9ED69D515A05099E4E4CC5CE59509C6
  • createdAtMillis - 1729490021684
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18480686191520442395BEC61FDC9F04497F4DCD0E8278EE6A8D9ED69D515A05099E4E4CC5CE59509C6