Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 13:47:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EE265B8D88CF47E53583D4206D8D8BFE90CBD468302762550DB553BCC84FACAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

All tweets are achived and available. The screenshot is about the subdomain "blog" of Twitter, which was the Twitter corporate blog (long form). Only those appear to be missing. For archives of actual tweets, try e.g.: https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://twitter.com/NIH

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1847876085314154546
participantId -
raterParticipantId - EE265B8D88CF47E53583D4206D8D8BFE90CBD468302762550DB553BCC84FACAF
createdAtMillis - 1729432047701
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1847876085314154546EE265B8D88CF47E53583D4206D8D8BFE90CBD468302762550DB553BCC84FACAF