Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 18:08:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C276A4E308E6D93ABB63168B372495477113FCAAB4AB3561EC10C6488CB20163
Participant Details

Original Note:

All tweets are achived and available. The screenshot is about the subdomain "blog" of Twitter, which was the Twitter corporate blog (long form). Only those appear to be missing. For archives of actual tweets, try e.g.: https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://twitter.com/NIH

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1847876085314154546
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C276A4E308E6D93ABB63168B372495477113FCAAB4AB3561EC10C6488CB20163
createdAtMillis - 1729447717138
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1847876085314154546C276A4E308E6D93ABB63168B372495477113FCAAB4AB3561EC10C6488CB20163