Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 18:27:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 668A38E6FBD833A6E562EE64D2897E9ABCDBD2ADCD94E7AA4EA39D1A5B622C71
Participant Details

Original Note:

All tweets are achived and available. The screenshot is about the subdomain "blog" of Twitter, which was the Twitter corporate blog (long form). Only those appear to be missing. For archives of actual tweets, try e.g.: https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://twitter.com/NIH

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1847876085314154546
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 668A38E6FBD833A6E562EE64D2897E9ABCDBD2ADCD94E7AA4EA39D1A5B622C71
createdAtMillis - 1729448851493
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1847876085314154546668A38E6FBD833A6E562EE64D2897E9ABCDBD2ADCD94E7AA4EA39D1A5B622C71