Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 06:29:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53DB0932660EB3F346801D30DB4F3E6C8DFEB02CAB4B84B73E978941DD6E8571
Participant Details

Original Note:

All tweets are achived and available. The screenshot is about the subdomain "blog" of Twitter, which was the Twitter corporate blog (long form). Only those appear to be missing. For archives of actual tweets, try e.g.: https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://twitter.com/NIH

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1847876085314154546
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 53DB0932660EB3F346801D30DB4F3E6C8DFEB02CAB4B84B73E978941DD6E8571
createdAtMillis - 1729405784202
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 184787608531415454653DB0932660EB3F346801D30DB4F3E6C8DFEB02CAB4B84B73E978941DD6E8571