Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 16:23:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF684F6EBD2AD5B90CC600195B8A83B6F4751A11E2EDF14C4C155C54993EDFCB
Participant Details

Original Note:

All tweets are achived and available. The screenshot is about the subdomain "blog" of Twitter, which was the Twitter corporate blog (long form). Only those appear to be missing. For archives of actual tweets, try e.g.: https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://twitter.com/NIH

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1847875785052365226
participantId -
raterParticipantId - BF684F6EBD2AD5B90CC600195B8A83B6F4751A11E2EDF14C4C155C54993EDFCB
createdAtMillis - 1729441406043
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1847875785052365226BF684F6EBD2AD5B90CC600195B8A83B6F4751A11E2EDF14C4C155C54993EDFCB