Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 07:18:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 960A99AC3BC8AB899F4328921C2A2F18982F6F302381CB3B7DC213F71658F6CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

All tweets are achived and available. The screenshot is about the subdomain "blog" of Twitter, which was the Twitter corporate blog (long form). Only those appear to be missing. For archives of actual tweets, try e.g.: https://web.archive.org/web/20240000000000*/https://twitter.com/NIH

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1847875785052365226
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 960A99AC3BC8AB899F4328921C2A2F18982F6F302381CB3B7DC213F71658F6CB
createdAtMillis - 1729495094223
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1847875785052365226960A99AC3BC8AB899F4328921C2A2F18982F6F302381CB3B7DC213F71658F6CB