Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 10:47:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 30DD93EB0667053FBC6151D13458079C87E4C31A223F74BEC92F8C865D327B44
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Not only is there no proof or correlation to being an ad and the site cited, but the note author is actually trying to place advertising of an academic fraud service on a community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847872074204721417
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 30DD93EB0667053FBC6151D13458079C87E4C31A223F74BEC92F8C865D327B44
  • createdAtMillis - 1729421264019
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184787207420472141730DD93EB0667053FBC6151D13458079C87E4C31A223F74BEC92F8C865D327B44