Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-22 01:24:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD4364FAAE7FE1B5AE19ABA1027CCBEF739E556B9D9A89C358798A2EEA1D6D50
Participant Details

Original Note:

The argument of "Well, we don't know FOR CERTAIN if the baby would survive" as an argument in favor of 9TH MONTH ABORTIONS is laughable. And framing it as a "Restriction on medical choice" is disingenuous and dishonest. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847815218182967346
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD4364FAAE7FE1B5AE19ABA1027CCBEF739E556B9D9A89C358798A2EEA1D6D50
  • createdAtMillis - 1729560261349
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1847815218182967346DD4364FAAE7FE1B5AE19ABA1027CCBEF739E556B9D9A89C358798A2EEA1D6D50