Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 01:55:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1DBA2F24DECFEE42F4EDBA53A5F14A34313A0E7015AF2CAB6963E1DEF42EE61
Participant Details

Original Note:

The argument of "Well, we don't know FOR CERTAIN if the baby would survive" as an argument in favor of 9TH MONTH ABORTIONS is laughable. And framing it as a "Restriction on medical choice" is disingenuous and dishonest. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847815218182967346
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1DBA2F24DECFEE42F4EDBA53A5F14A34313A0E7015AF2CAB6963E1DEF42EE61
  • createdAtMillis - 1729389316624
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1847815218182967346C1DBA2F24DECFEE42F4EDBA53A5F14A34313A0E7015AF2CAB6963E1DEF42EE61