Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 13:28:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 87ED80D118819C5FA166ED7C03F6D63432355A5B3A1E60A2D38FDBCC7DA22C98
Participant Details

Original Note:

The argument of "Well, we don't know FOR CERTAIN if the baby would survive" as an argument in favor of 9TH MONTH ABORTIONS is laughable. And framing it as a "Restriction on medical choice" is disingenuous and dishonest. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847815218182967346
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 87ED80D118819C5FA166ED7C03F6D63432355A5B3A1E60A2D38FDBCC7DA22C98
  • createdAtMillis - 1729430905243
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184781521818296734687ED80D118819C5FA166ED7C03F6D63432355A5B3A1E60A2D38FDBCC7DA22C98