Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 12:41:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 006C9B4C2FD02DF16EEAF975BFFDA972F64C4A79BCE7EB1CEB43E00F39BD63FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The argument of "Well, we don't know FOR CERTAIN if the baby would survive" as an argument in favor of 9TH MONTH ABORTIONS is laughable. And framing it as a "Restriction on medical choice" is disingenuous and dishonest. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847815218182967346
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 006C9B4C2FD02DF16EEAF975BFFDA972F64C4A79BCE7EB1CEB43E00F39BD63FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1729514504086
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1847815218182967346006C9B4C2FD02DF16EEAF975BFFDA972F64C4A79BCE7EB1CEB43E00F39BD63FE