Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-21 01:20:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9EA4A56199E8517851671A35808678C60C096F35B7548B4A00E1FD900FA106CE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post clearly expresses the personal opinion of the author. Proposed note’s appeal to authority cites an ACOG opinion on ethical and policy issues—matters outside the organization’s medical competence. It belongs in the replies, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847812639335878746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9EA4A56199E8517851671A35808678C60C096F35B7548B4A00E1FD900FA106CE
  • createdAtMillis - 1729473651749
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18478126393358787469EA4A56199E8517851671A35808678C60C096F35B7548B4A00E1FD900FA106CE