Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 12:20:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8127DD24FEFD8D0845A0D194B590AA4CD76BDD305140F42737A9B105514B92ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post clearly expresses the personal opinion of the author. Proposed note’s appeal to authority cites an ACOG opinion on ethical and policy issues—matters outside the organization’s medical competence. It belongs in the replies, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847812639335878746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8127DD24FEFD8D0845A0D194B590AA4CD76BDD305140F42737A9B105514B92ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1729426847959
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18478126393358787468127DD24FEFD8D0845A0D194B590AA4CD76BDD305140F42737A9B105514B92ED