Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 10:37:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 616002FD680A9C8B32FD93A49B2FA54CBA635F68FD20603EF8027DAF52E6C500
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post clearly expresses the personal opinion of the author. Proposed note’s appeal to authority cites an ACOG opinion on ethical and policy issues—matters outside the organization’s medical competence. It belongs in the replies, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847812639335878746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 616002FD680A9C8B32FD93A49B2FA54CBA635F68FD20603EF8027DAF52E6C500
  • createdAtMillis - 1729420625333
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1847812639335878746616002FD680A9C8B32FD93A49B2FA54CBA635F68FD20603EF8027DAF52E6C500