Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 14:51:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52CB6EDF5FFB35B401F3A3D1DAB796E41F508A4C80E9A546C0F01C6B3D5E8E3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post clearly expresses the personal opinion of the author. Proposed note’s appeal to authority cites an ACOG opinion on ethical and policy issues—matters outside the organization’s medical competence. It belongs in the replies, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847812639335878746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52CB6EDF5FFB35B401F3A3D1DAB796E41F508A4C80E9A546C0F01C6B3D5E8E3E
  • createdAtMillis - 1729435904498
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184781263933587874652CB6EDF5FFB35B401F3A3D1DAB796E41F508A4C80E9A546C0F01C6B3D5E8E3E