Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-20 01:34:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1ED456DE33312246E2FD53A7D4E72E5FDB4654BF2B2419B07F9777EC433CA565
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Post clearly expresses the personal opinion of the author. Proposed note’s appeal to authority cites an ACOG opinion on ethical and policy issues—matters outside the organization’s medical competence. It belongs in the replies, not CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847812639335878746
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1ED456DE33312246E2FD53A7D4E72E5FDB4654BF2B2419B07F9777EC433CA565
  • createdAtMillis - 1729388074950
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18478126393358787461ED456DE33312246E2FD53A7D4E72E5FDB4654BF2B2419B07F9777EC433CA565