Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-19 22:20:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 106EB1ED2B56BDD19225252ED8A64CEFDDCA0CACE1AC38771ACCC8B2CD6DE294
Participant Details

Original Note:

This TGA post faces criticism for outdated methods and transparency issues. Critics like Kevin McKernan argue TGA’s tests using a single qPCR assay underestimate DNA contamination by up to 100x. The FOI 5286 doc is 80% redacted, blocking independent review https://t.co/N8sGVbnQA2 https://t.co/AhQbCSDPt9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1847539348797083732
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 106EB1ED2B56BDD19225252ED8A64CEFDDCA0CACE1AC38771ACCC8B2CD6DE294
  • createdAtMillis - 1729376400458
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1847539348797083732106EB1ED2B56BDD19225252ED8A64CEFDDCA0CACE1AC38771ACCC8B2CD6DE294